I’ve always considered the unfurling koru to be the definitive indigenous image for one of the two mandates of the church. There is mission, but there is also maturity. There is a width issue amd there is a depth issue. A frequent blindspot in the church in NZ at the moment is an industrious commitment to ‘mission’ without an equal commitment to ‘maturity’.
I like the native/indigenous/natural image and an application to the church. The church should in a way be ‘indigenous’, rather than imposed, in every environment. The fern grows in well-watered places; maybe there’s something in that. Most of all I see new growth – perhaps a little green, but that’s ok! & 2Tim 2:9 “God’s word is not bound” seems relevant too, re ‘unfurling’.
I’ve always considered the unfurling koru to be the definitive indigenous image for one of the two mandates of the church. There is mission, but there is also maturity. There is a width issue amd there is a depth issue. A frequent blindspot in the church in NZ at the moment is an industrious commitment to ‘mission’ without an equal commitment to ‘maturity’.
I like the native/indigenous/natural image and an application to the church. The church should in a way be ‘indigenous’, rather than imposed, in every environment. The fern grows in well-watered places; maybe there’s something in that. Most of all I see new growth – perhaps a little green, but that’s ok! & 2Tim 2:9 “God’s word is not bound” seems relevant too, re ‘unfurling’.